Ricardo Authors FRA Research into High-Speed Rail Noise Level Compliance

Ricardo Authors FRA Research into High-Speed Rail Noise Level Compliance

Ricardo has completed a new study that will improve accuracy when comparing global high-speed rail noise reduction standards and the comparitive costs of mitigation measures.

The report, High Speed Rail: Cost of Compliance for Noise Mitigation Procedures, has been published by the Federal Railroad Administration (FRA), an agency of the United States Department of Transportation.

High Speed Rail Noise

Central to the study was the development of an analytical tool to enable global standards and regulations to be cross-compared on a more consistent basis and provide more accuracy when assessing mitigation methods between one jurisdiction and the next.

The study was prompted by an earlier report commissioned by the FRA that demonstrated how attempts at making comparisons of noise regulations and standards for high-speed rail systems around the world had been complicated by the variations in the sound level measurement metrics, such as measurement locations, microphone position, train operating conditions (e.g. speed) and measurement procedures.

The tool developed by Ricardo’s teams, ‘CONTRAST’ (Comparison Of Noise for TRAin Standards), can be used to determine, for example, how a train set compliant with European Technical Specifications for Interoperability performs against US or Japanese regulations.

Cost Comparison an Additional Component of the Research

A second task for the research team was to demonstrate how the tool could help the US rail industry compare the costs of various noise mitigation technologies used around the world.

More than 70 different options that could be adopted by the US were initially assessed before the modelling was applied in more detail to two representative high speed routes of similar length – the Northeast Corridor (NEC) and California High Speed Rail (CHSR) system.

The analysis illustrated, for example, how the same mitigation methods would cost five times more on the NEC representative track than on the CAHSR, mostly due to the higher population density of the Northeast Corridor’s impacted zone.

This article was originally published by Ricardo Rail.

View supplier

Contact Ricardo Rail

Use the form opposite to get in touch with Ricardo Rail directly to discuss any requirements you might have.








    We'd love to send you the latest news and information from the world of Railway-News. Please tick the box if you agree to receive them.

    For your peace of mind here is a link to our Privacy Policy.

    By submitting this form, you consent to allow Railway-News to store and process this information.

    Subscribe
    Follow Railway-News on LinkedIn
    Follow Railway-News on Twitter